REALITIES
By Martin Farrell — Thursday, August 29th, 2024
I’m happy to have received two letters from Kelly Scoles this week. The first is a comment on last week’s letter from Ryan Shiells about the sacred Name “Jesus” alleged not to be His real name. This name (Jesus) is, according to Mr. Schells, the result of a “bait and switch disinformation” by “nefariously funded religious experts.” We expressed our differences of opinion by email prior to publication. I will not engage again. Arguing about historically established spellings of YHWH, Jesus, and Yeshua, screened through a half-dozen languages over 4,000 years, is unproductive. YHWH, Hebrew name for God, was held so sacred that vowels were removed to make that word unspeakable. Jesus spoke in Aramaic, still spoken in a half-dozen isolated areas of the East. I’m not a linguist, historian, or theologian, but these are accepted historical facts. **** Kelly, once again you expect me to answer an avalanche of assorted statements. To save face, if not patience, I will bulletize some answers. As that “older person” I don’t dwell on “everything from the rosy nostalgia of youth.” Memories “inconsistent” with the best of yesteryear are not “aberrant.” That image is yours not mine. But you come closer to reality when you characterize the Republic today as, comparatively, a “catastrophe” and possibly “hellish”. You Democrats have jumped tracks to the “Freedom” line just as you jumped from old Joe Biden to giddy Kamala when Obama snapped his fingers. **** **** You criticize House Speaker Mike Johnson for calling homosexuality “pornography.” He’s only restating the traditional moral foundations of America. You and your Leftist minions want to change history to suit your anti-American moral philosophy. I hope conservative traditionalists can defeat that plan in the coming presidential election, for survival’s sake. **** You defend government’s stocking of virulently pornographic books in children’s public libraries. Words, lurid illustrations and photos of homosexual activities may not offend you, but they provoke strong remedial demands from most of America. This outrageous content is so bad that congress stopped Republicans attempts to show it to members. “AOC and Raskin: Pornography Is Okay for Children, Not for Congress” - “Democrats were infuriated”. Jamie Raskin called the display “an assault on the dignity of the committee.” “AOC accused Republicans of reaching a “new low” by showing “pornographic” images to Congress.” Why would Democrats complain when they demand that our children view this filth? Michelangelo’s statue of David? The solution here is to have a Leftist Democrat artist chisel-away the offending male genitalia and pronounce it a masterpiece of Transgender art. |