Fire Chief Rigo Landeros reminded the Council of the El Nino Community Town Hall Meeting. It will be held on Tuesday, November 17, 6 p.m.-8 p.m. at the Veterans Memorial Building, 511 Second St., Fillmore.

The November 10, 2015 Fillmore City Council Meeting had a full agenda including a Consent Calendar second reading of the Humane Living Ordinance which brought back local realtors to voice their opposition.

First to speak on the ordinance was former Fillmore Realtor Doug Hause who did not hold back when questioning the Councils motives stating "....I just wonder if this Council hasn't been lobbied by contractors and others in the construction business to sweeten opportunities with the strong arm of the government in town" suggesting the council had been influenced. He commented on the financial stability of some vulnerable residents "living paycheck to paycheck" stating "this ordinance by its very nature puts many at risk" leaving the door open to the unscrupulous predator practice of selling for the minimum through private sale. "I have lived in this town for 45 years and never have I seen such a mean spirited self-serving proposal as this ordinance."

The second person to speak was Realtor Cindy Diaz-Telly who wanted to correct the City record on a number of issues. One was the amount of citizen calls the City received concerning the issue as 33. Diaz-Telly informed the Council that and additional 22 residents contacted her stating they could not get through, that they received a recording stating the message box was full. She also disagreed stating Council Member Rick Neal had accused the realtors of threatening a lawsuit, responding there was no threat of a lawsuit. Another problem she stated in the claims of some Council Members was that discussions had already been tried, saying, "Talking at this podium for five minutes is not a conversation."

Diaz-Telly spoke at length of legal problems associated with the ordinance and questioned the response at the previous meeting by City Attorney Tiffany Israel stating other towns have had a good response to similar ordinances. Diaz-Telly questioned "What cities are they, what is the median income?" She then questioned the proposed six months trial period asking, "What's your measure of success....at the end you're passing an open-ended ordinance" and ended with suggesting the Council slow down and "consider other options."

Council Member Rick Neal, who has pushed to move forward made a motion to approve the ordinance. Council Member Manuel Minjares quickly interjected that he also felt the council members had not met with the realtors stated, "I want to give them the opportunity to talk it over with them." Council Member Diane McCall agreed with Minjares stating that people are still telling her they disagree with the ordinance. "I'm for putting together a better product."

Council Member Carrie Broggie responded, "I keep hearing the same thing...citing the same points....I've heard nothing new.....if you want to talk to realtors I'm ok with that."

Neal stated he would not talk to any realtors without an attorney present with each realtor and that it would cost the City a great deal of money to do that. He went on to cite the higher cost of Santa Barbara's ordinance compared to the proposed Fillmore ordinance, but did not mention the huge difference in income between the two cities.

McCall reminded the Council that many of the homes in Fillmore are very old and there is no documented history on improvements and changes made. There are homes in Fillmore that date before the Fillmore Planning Department.

Minjares told the others he would like to see a subcommittee created to investigate the need for the ordinance. Mayor Douglas Tucker reported he had heard from both sides, in favor and opposed and understood the need for housing and for safety, but "the end result is the ordinance improves the value of properties." Tucker ended with "the hardest part is we have to make decisions....allowing the trial of six months we'll see how it works for the community."

A vote was taken ending in 3-2, with Broggie seconding Neal’s motion and Tucker being the deciding vote in favor. Both Minjares and McCall voted No.

A Public Hearing item was the proposed 8% increase in trash removal fees. Fillmore resident Ray Mel addressed the Council stating there was no need to increase the brown yard clippings bin because there is less need since the drought and if the number of bins picked up stayed the same there would not be a need to increase the costs. He stated that so many utilities have increased and it is having a hard impact of residents.

Councilman Neal responded, "I think there was an increase coming anyway." It has been 5 years since Harrison Industries has increased the fee and a 5% was expected. There was an offer of picking up all three bins every week at an increase of 8% and the Council agreed that for the added 3% the citizens were getting a better offer. Tucker reminded others that Harrison is still cleaning the streets without charging and McCall added that they also clean up after events with no charge to the City.

Fire Chief Rigo Landeros reminded the Council of the El Nino Community Town Hall Meeting to hear from experts on the potential for a very wet winter season and the planning and response efforts underway.

The agencies represented at the meeting: National Weather Service; Ventura County Fire Department; Fillmore City Fire Department; Ventura County Sheriff's Office; Watershed Protection District; Ventura County Sheriff's Office of Emergency Services; Ventura County Animal Services; American Red Cross.

It will be held on Tuesday, November 17, 2015 6 p.m.-8 p.m. at the Veterans Memorial Building, 511 Second St., Fillmore.