One cannot turn on the radio or television or read a newspaper in today’s environment without coming across some political advocate bombarding us with terms like redistribution of wealth and socialism. What do they mean? Are we a nation that is willing to be governed by these concepts and, if so, would that be a bad thing?
A fundamental belief of socialism is the redistribution of wealth. Under this concept the majority of the wealth is entrusted to the state which in turn redistributes it according to what it determines to be each individual’s best needs. That concept, in theory, would result in the elimination of the poorest and richest classes and the creation of a middle class that has a large degree of equality. But it is only a theory and it has never remotely approached reality.

One needs only to look at the countries that have operated under a socialist system for the longest periods of time. They all continue to maintain the “have and have not” classes. Some even have an alarming growth of the “will not class.” The elite still exist and the poor remain poor. Not all of them own a home. Not all of them own a car. Not all of their children go to college.

The preferred method of redistributing wealth is not by appropriating personal property but by placing an inordinate degree of taxes on earnings and property.

In many socialist countries well over 50% of a working person’s salary is withheld as taxes. A very significant “value added tax” is placed on most items not considered as necessities. That results in 60-75% of the proceeds of the workforce going into the government’s coffer who then determines who gets what.
A socialistic society strives to create equality, however, in doing so it must of necessity destroy individualism and initiative. The norm for virtually everything in a socialistic society must be the lowest acceptable performance.

A classic of this method is utilized by some organized labor in the United States. Unions want their employees to be paid equal salaries regardless of the quality or quantity of work performed. Union employees are discouraged from providing performance that might have the outcome of raising what is currently considered to be the lowest acceptable performance. Promotions and pay raises are to be determined by seniority and not by performance. Innovation such as new methods or technology that may result in loss of jobs is highly discouraged.

In a recent study of the nations of the world there was an attempt to identify the happiest people on earth. The results concluded that a small country in Europe, Denmark, was the overall happiest. Denmark has a socialist government and therefore one might argue that if it makes so many people happy a socialist government must be preferable to countries that have other types of governments. When questioned about what was responsible for the level of happiness in their country many of the Danes replied, “We don’t expect much and therefore we are seldom disappointed.”

Our beloved nation was built upon great expectations and a willingness to accept many disappointments on our journey to achieving our full potential. We have prevailed in so many ways because of our individualism, our unwillingness to let others think for us. Where much is given much is expected. We have been given the opportunity to live and thrive in this great land and we need to always endeavor to keep our expectations high and reject the mediocrity that socialism promises.