Bob Crum

Video by Bob Crum.

This week I planned to discuss lenses and mirrorless cameras. But recent happenings – a storm and a photo - dictate a detour. C'est la vie.

It was late Friday afternoon. Rain finally let up somewhat. I went to the Old Telegraph road bridge over the Sespe Creek overflow. Oh my, I haven't seen Sespe Creek flowing like this in years! Of course I shot several photos. One is... surprise... the Photo of the Week.

I emailed it to an out-of-town photography friend. Just trying to be helpful, she sent it back re-edited with reasons why I should consider her suggestions. A lively discussion ensued.

Paraphrasing some of her points: Too cloudy to display detail in the image, clouds, especially storm clouds will always be soft, not hard edges, noise removal will soften the clouds, the middle is never going to be as sharp as the foreground on a cloudy day, and the important part... where do you want the eyes to go... you do not want the eye to go all over the place which they will do if every detail is sharpened.

Nothing wrong with her suggestions, just different. You'll see that I processed the photo differently and explain the reasons why.

It was a gloomy and stormy day. Ominous clouds on the horizon. Rain poured forth in great quantities swelling Sespe Creek from bank to bank with a torrent of muddy water. The challenge: Portray the scene with a single photo! Hold that thought.

Normally it is a good idea to highlight a focal point. This time I didn't. From my perspective, no one item is more important than another except maybe the creek. It's mostly a scenic image. As such, I'd rather your eyes enjoy roaming over the entire image... taking it all in with glee.

Soft subtle storm clouds are not my style. In post processing (PP), I emphasized them to add character. Drama if you please. They're storm clouds - not cotton candy. Different interpretations of the same thing. Interesting.

For maximum depth of field (DOF) I selected f/11. I preferred that everything from foreground to the distant mountain be in focus. Instead of softening the middle to de-emphasize it as suggested, I added structure to the creek's ripples in the image center to emphasize the flowing water. Preferences rule.

ISO is the level of sensitivity of a camera to available light. ISO of 10,000 is very high but necessary due to rapidly decreasing light. Cameras generate undesirable noise, specks in the photo, at a high ISO. Opening the lens to it's widest aperture, f/3.5, would allow more light to enter the camera thus lower the ISO and noise but at the expense of decreasing the DOF. Not an option. Instead, I dealt with the noise in PP while preserving a reasonable amount of detail. Different ways to deal with an issue.

I polished the image by adding a little contrast and increased the exposure slightly (for publication purposes) while attempting to maintain the feeling of a gloomy, stormy afternoon. I like to think I succeeded.

This example illustrates that there are many ways of creating a photo. From camera settings to editing processes, creative opportunities abound. Tremendously stimulating! One reason why I'm so passionate about photography as well as delightfully addicted. Caution: It's contagious!

After last week's column, you rushed out and bought a 'real' camera... didn't you? Good! As a photographer, it's invaluable. Just sayin'.

Happy shooting.

Email comments, suggestions or questions to: bob@fillmoregazette.com