Bob Crum

When on assignment, I'm a photojournalist. Other days I fancy myself as a 'fine art photographer'. For example, it's now widely known that my specialty is, ahem, mermaid boudoir photography. Fine art indeed.

Besides photos, I make prints. To wax philosophical, a photo is better enjoyed as a print. A family photo album is a treasure. A photo on Facebook... here today gone tomorrow. Where's the value in that? But I digress.

We are 18 years into the 21st Century & the photo paper, frame & mat industry still isn't producing products designed for digital images. Of my 2,374,716 readers (if only I got paid by head count!) I'll bet only two of you—three at most—are shooting film! Yet, the only frames & mats made are for the likes of Rip Van Clodhopper who refuses to give up his Konica range finder film camera and only wants 4X6” prints.

It's about aspect ratios. In its simplest form, aspect ratio describes the relationship between two sides of a rectangle. The aspect ratio of 35mm film is 3:2. Aspect ratios for most digital cameras is 3:2, 4:3 for point-and-shoots. Why if the 3:2 aspect ratio has every logical reason going against it, as you'll soon see, does it dominate? Perhaps because it happens to have the closest proportions to the Golden Rectangle of any other major film format which presents the most aesthetically pleasing composition? The ratio 3:2 is great if ONLY the paper, mat and frame industry provided 3:2 products accordingly.

My Canon 7DMKII aspect ratio is 3:2. Fine, if like Clodhopper all I want are 4X6” prints. No cropping required. For other sizes like 5X7, 8X10, 11X17, 3:2 is problematic. Example: Mathematically, a 3:2 aspect ratio relates to an 8X12” print not 8X10”. If the lab doesn't make 8X12” prints, your 8X12” digital image will get cropped... loosing a full 2 inches of the original image. Furthermore, no math will make 3:2 equal to 7:5 but cropping for a 5x7” image isn't quite so severe. It's all a mess!

Not only don't photo paper sizes directly relate to 3:2 digital photos, go to Michaels or Aaron Brothers for a mat and frame and good luck. Is wanting to fulfill our digital needs expecting too much?

On a more pleasant note, I'm venturing into... ahem... art. It's contagious you know. Being a proud member of the Fillmore Artist Guild, (email me for Guild info) I got the itch! Big time! But my medium is different as you might expect. I thought: Why not combine 'art' and photography? So I did!

The Photo of the Week is of my first artistic creation—my Art Nouveau 'masterpiece' titled “The Blonde Lady”. I photographed it, imported it into Adobe Lightroom to process the 'RAW' image. Exported the photo from LR to Photoshop Elements as a .tiff image for a touch of NIK Viveza 2. Saved the image & exported to Topaz Labs Impression program where I applied a touch of artist Jim LaSala's style. Viola! Digitized art from my painting. Now I can resize my digitized painting from 4X6” to poster size to satisfy any art collector's preference. I also have 9X12” and 11X14” 200g/m² (90 lb.) cold press watercolor paper for collector's that prefer a genuine textured print! Oh what FUN! What do you think???

My process needs a name so please email me your suggestions. Of course I'm working on my next creation, another masterpiece! An itch must be scratched you know!

Happy photoing!

Send suggestions, comments or questions to: bob@fillmoregazette.com