November 2nd you will be able to vote for THREE candidates

Question #6: What do you perceive as the most important issues for the School Board, and the District? What policies would you work to change, add or subtract? For example, 20% of a student’s grade is determined by the AR program. How would you handle objections from parents in regards to the AR standards? Should the program be modified (and how?) or remain unchanged? Why?

Tony Prado: The most important issue facing the Board and the District is money. The federal, state and local economies are in bad shape and will continue to be in bad shape until tax revenue increases. All district employees deserve salary increases, all our educational programs need an infusion of money and our facilities need upgrading. The District is working hard in educating our students with less money. Not knowing what monies to expect from the state has put the District in a position of guessing how much to cut from their budget as has been the case the last two years
Grading issues of teachers at each school site becomes the responsibility of the principals. Board members should not attempt to micromanage grades. When parents have a concern about grading systems of a teacher or a school site, parents should contact the teacher first, then the principal and then the superintendent. If the concern continues then it should be brought to the attention of the Board. The Board then will discuss the issue. A majority of the Board members will determine a course of action.
AR is having a positive impact in our District. More students are reading! In our District 2nd language learners are a high percentage of our students and its helping them learn English, other students are learning to be better readers and writers. Personally, I do not believe AR should be 20% of a students grade. Remember, vote for Tony Prado.

Lucy Rangel: Some important issues are: earning back the trust of parents, staff, and the community, future budget cuts due to lack of funding, and evaluating the effectiveness of programs to raise student achievement.
I would like to address the current change at the high school regarding the Accelerated Reading program as I have had a number of parents contact me regarding this issue. We have had this program in our district since the late1990’s. Most of the research has been done in the elementary classroom, where it has proven to be successful. However, there are limited studies regarding AR use with high school students. It is at this level where most parental concerns have been voiced now that AR will count for 20% of a student’s English grade. Since AR is a supplementary and not a core program, I understand the concerns of these parents.
If I could make any change in this program, I would use AR as an incentive. Once students scored proficient or advanced on their standardized tests, and they maintained this level, they would have several options. They would be allowed to read any book they were interested in (with parent approval), and not have to take a test. The other option would be that if they read an AR book, took a test, and received a passing score, then they could earn extra credit points. Forcing students to read for pleasure can become counteractive for high school students, especially if they are already good readers.

Mark Austin: An important issue facing the School Board and District will continue to be providing a quality education, while experiencing ongoing budget constraints. This issue will require a strong School Board in the coming months, as it is likely that additional budget reductions may be needed. Another issue facing the School Board and District is the continued failure to meet the State Academic Performance Index (API) and Federal Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) standards. While some progress is being made to meet the API and AYP standards, my belief is that this is not good enough, and that we are failing to provide our children a quality education.
The Accelerated Reading (AR) Program may be an opportunity to improve a program that could substantially improve the quality of education. The AR Program’s primary objective was to promote reading, which has been shown to increase academic achievement. However, what has occurred within the District has become quite the opposite of positive in many cases. Children are circumventing their reading assignments by watching movies done on the assigned book. Other students have gone so far as to have their peers prepare the written assignments on the reading assignments. In other words, the AR Program is not working as intended. In my opinion, this program needs to be re-examined by the School Board and modified to attain its objective of promoting reading. www.votemarkaustin.com.

Kimberly Rivers: The greatest challenge our Districts faces is providing a first class education to ALL students. Too many students are being suspended and not enough are graduating. Our District must have a program in place for families struggling to keep their kids in school that let’s them know every child, even the so called “problem” kids are welcome in our classrooms. Not only is this the legal duty of our District, but also I believe it is a basic requirement for public education.
Second, wherever I go in the District I talk with people who feel heard, while others feel their ideas will never be heard. A promise I can make is that my door will be open to everyone; students, parents, staff, residents, you are all stakeholders in our District. Only with input from everyone can we define and create a path to a first class education.
I understand the AR program is intended to encourage reading. I have heard from families and teachers that the excessive reading assignments and detail orientated quizzes are causing students and parents to be resentful of reading, leading some students to pretend they have read a book and trade quiz answers. For some, reading has become distasteful. Clearly the AR program needs to be evaluated for effectiveness. I believe that with input from parents, teachers and students the program can be modified to not only encourage reading, but to encourage a love of reading that is so vital to creating life long learners. www.votekimrivers.com.

Dave Wilde: The budget issue is huge. We have to do what we can reduce the threat of staff layoffs. Teachers and support staff are what make the difference in a student's education. Funds must be made available for instructional materials and instructional staff preparation. An addition to the budget issue is the student environment and safety. With decreasing funds we must continue to do what we can to guarantee students a safe and positive learning environment.
The second question is not about policies in general, but specifically the high school AR program. Parents, teachers, and student responses have not been decisive. Most high school teachers feel they are preparing students to be successful readers in what ever future challenges they face. That is their job. The 20% issue is designed to impress students with the importance of reading. When the percentage was 10% many students failed to complete their AR assignments, and the hope was that 20% might change that. Is it right? I don't know yet. If students still fail to complete their reading assignments another plan should be implemented. The board should not be making decisions about the AR program, otherwise they could be accused of micromanaging the district. It is the high school that has that responsibility. If there is a significant number of students and parents who have concerns about the program they need to continue meeting with the high school to reach an agreement. The board's input should be a last resort.