School Board Examines AR
Accelerated Reading program under fire
At Tuesday night’s AR study session, Fillmore Hight School Principal John Wilber spoke to the school board in support of the program.
At Tuesday night’s AR study session, Fillmore Hight School Principal John Wilber spoke to the school board in support of the program.

According to the website of Renaissance Learning, the maker of Accelerated Reader (www.renlearn.com) or “AR” is “the most cost effective successful reading software of all time.” Over 60,000 schools use this program nationwide. In 2010 Renaissance Learning had sales of $130.1 million. The site goes on to state that the software provides “frequent progress monitoring and produces the greatest reading improvement for the least investment.” They also report that AR “is fully supported by scientifically based research.” Another benefit touted of this program is that it builds a lifelong love of reading. Some parents of high school students at Fillmore High School would not agree with that assessment.

On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 the FUSD Board of Education met for a public “Study Session” on AR. Assistant Superintendent Katy Hadley explained, “AR is not a teaching program, it is a reading management program. It is a way for teachers to track the outside reading that students are doing.” The computer-based program has a list of 150,000 books for students to choose from. Each book is rated at a particular reading level and is worth a certain number of points. Depending on their level of reading proficiency (above, below or at grade level) students are assigned a certain number of points they must earn. They earn points by taking a test after they have read a book. At the high school AR is 20% of a students grade in their English class while at the middle school it accounts for 10%. At the elementary level AR points are tied to “prizes” such as stickers, ice cream and parties. Hadley reported that AR came to FUSD in 2000-2001. During that time there has been issues and Task Forces were formed, School Site Councils dealt with it and curriculum committees examined the program. FHS Principal John Wilber began the presentation in support of the AR program stating that the year they brought in AR, “Staff felt that AR was the single thing that we did that made an impact on our school climate to make it more of an academic school.” He stated his belief that it is the “commitment to high expectations in reading” that has led to recent improvements in “performance” at the school. FHS English Teacher Jennifer Fitzpatrick presented a report regarding her department’s support for the AR program. Fitzpatrick was the only representative of the English Department in attendance and found herself charged with defending the program against the brunt of the parent’s frustration. Her report focused on the value of reading in future success and the important contribution that the English Department feels AR makes in creating proficient readers. She informed the Board on the California State Standards, which “mandate that in addition to their regular school reading… students read annually one-half million words by grade 4, one million words [annually] by grade 8, and two million words [annually] by grade 12.” The standards intend that those words come from sources including “a wide variety of classic and contemporary literature, magazines, newspapers and online information.” The AR program aims at getting students to that goal. Fitzpatrick presented an interesting “footnote” to help understand how many words a million actually is. The entire Harry Potter series (seven books) totals 1.08 million words. While the report was aimed at supporting AR, many of the points made to support it refer to “recreational reading” and “the value of free voluntary reading.” Many who spoke to the Board clearly did not feel that AR was “voluntary” when it makes up 20% of the students grade. Approximately 25 parents, some FUSD staff members, and a couple students spoke to the Board regarding their concerns. The concern voiced most often was with AR making up 20% of students grades. At one point Hadley reminded the Board that Board policy and Ed Code “do state that grades given for course work of instruction in our district is determined by teachers of that course” She goes on to state the policy “does further state that parents and guardians should have an opportunity to work with schools in a mutually supportive and respectful partnership so their children are successful in school.” Board Member John Garnica took the floor to begin Board discussion and complemented Fitzpatrick on presenting the position of the English Department but “Where the rub is,” he pointed out “[is in the] implementation…[I think it can be] improved… How can we encourage kids to read in a positive manner?” A brief conversation clarifying that the evening would be spent in an information-gathering vein, Board Member Dave Wilde asked, “Where do we stand in determining [how] teachers [set their grading system]?” Superintendent Jeff Sweeney responded, “It’s a slippery slope” as school board start to meddle in the details of classrooms.

Once public comment began many parents expressed the great dislike that their children had for AR some currently in the school several alumni. One parent commented about her home with an FHS alum “I can’t even say AR in the house.” David Smallwood stated he’s attending his first meeting, and stated his opinion “the system is flawed” when 20% of the grade takes 50% of the time “It may be a slippery slope but maybe we have to take a step… to make recommendations.” Luanne Brock, an FUSD staff member but also a parent reminded the Board that this issue has been doing on for ten years and the issues are the same. Issues then due to “inflexibility… same issues, same complaints and same refusals.” She expressed the frustration of watching this process over a decade and asked “How much farther would we get on an issue if we truly listened to our parent community…?”

This session was the beginning of the discussion for the Board and Sweeney indicated staff members will meet to review information presented and recommend a course for the Board. All action items on the agenda were approved and the meeting was adjourned to June 14 at 6:30.

Video of the Meeting:

Press the play button above to watch the meeting.