Sewer Plant given top awards
Chris Hook of the American Public Works Association (AWPA) presented to Mayor Patti Walker the Project of the Year award for our new wastewater treatment plant, at Tuesday’s regular council meeting. Honors for plant design were also paid to the city on February 18, at the National Engineers Week Banquet held at the Reagan Library. The Fillmore Wastewater Treatment Plant was recognized as Project of the Year. Seated left, Bert Rapp who was responsible for the entire project. By Wanda Castel de Oro — Wednesday, March 10th, 2010
Councilmember Brooks’ statement: "I have a different view of our sewer plant venture. I believe the decision to add a twenty six million dollar water recycling system was a poor choice with a costly result. It was an unneccessary component which has hiked up our sewer rates. Many citizens think that our sewer system project should have been vigorously streamlined in order to keep sewer rates down. As I listen to the reactions of the public I find that the majority of Fillmore citizens feel that our new sewer system has been overplanned and overbuilt at the expense of our wallets for decades to come. The cost to consumers is just too high." Project of the Year Hook stated that the Fillmore project was selected because of an innovative management approach and due to its many unique characteristics. For example the "Design-Build-Operate" procurement process helped assure that the plant was as efficient and economical as possible. It also included an exacting quality assurance program so that the plant would have low maintenance costs for 20 years. Another unique aspect was that the project included about 20 acres of subsurface drip irrigation in a park and school yards that provides water conservation, as well as wet weather disposal capability during rain events. Disposal during rain events is critical to eliminating treated sewer effluent discharges to the river. The project has also converted the Middle School, Sespe Elementary School and High School playgrounds to recycled water significantly reducing demand on the potable water system and reducing overall energy usage for that irrigation. Because the Fillmore Water Recycling Project conserves and reuses water it also won a $3,050,000 Proposition 50 grant. These unique cost-effective implementation strategies, partnering to share costs and maximize benefits, along with water conservation measures are what won the Project of the Year award for the Fillmore Water Recycling Program stated Hook. At the end of the presentation Councilmember Jaime Brooks read a statement, expressing his displeasure with the cost of the project(s), see picture inset. Mid-Year Budget Review Lawrence also sought to authorize the City Manager to retain Independent Financial Advisor and Bond Counsel firms to begin the process necessary to refund the 2002 Water System Certificates of Participation ($7,360,000). The 2002 COPs were redeemable beginning May 1, 2009 upon 30 days notice. City Staff is proposing to refund the 2002 COPs to lower interest costs. Council passed 5-0. Conaway thanked city staff for their diligent work in reorganizing the problem budget. “This is well beyond a normal Mid-year Budget Review. A lot of corrective action has been taken to put the train back on the track. I’m glad to see some accurate numbers come before us,” a reference to the earlier reorganization of the budget that took place after the departure of Finance Director Barbara Smith. One comment made by Lawrence during the presentation was, “Some things were budgeted more than once by $9 million”, meaning the new budget, which took place under interim finance director John Wooner and interim city manager Larry Pennell, contained over $9 million in errors. Councilmember Laurie Hernandez used the term “clean up” when referring to the extensive effort to cure the new budget. Fee Waiver Greenbelt Ordinance The City of Santa Paula desires to extend into the existing Santa Paula/Fillmore Greenbelt by Approx. 500 acres in order to accommodate the proposed Limoneria residential development. The City of Fillmore City council commented on the proposed project, stating that because the Greenbelt is proposed to be amended, the Greenbelt should become an ordinance (law) instead of the existing resolution, and Santa Paula should identify other property to include in the Greenbelt to make-up for the loss of 500 acres. Amended action, 5-0 passed. Name change - An Ordinance of the City of Fillmore to preserve unincorporated county lands between city of Santa Paula and Fillmore, aka, Greenbelt, passed 5-0. Citizen Mike Moore, who stated he lives in a greenbelt, took the public forum to say there was a lack of detail in the presentation and staff report. He invoked SOAR Measure B, and stated any change to the greenbelt area requires a “vote of the people”. Councilmember Gayle Washburn questioned Moore’s information, to which Mayor Walker said, “Not this agreement, it’s the county and Fillmore use,” referring to the 2007 agreement. B Street Extension City manager Yvonne Quiring asked Council to authorize retaining Independent Financial Advisor and Bond Counsel firms to begin the process necessary to refund the 2002 Water System Certificates of participation, approved 5-0. City Attorney Ted Schneider announced that the city will have an answer by Friday to the pending lawsuit brought by Richard McGee, with California’s Aware, a Brown Act violation watchdog group. |