November 2nd you will be able to vote for TWO candidates

Question #3: The council has expressed the goal to help local businesses. Where do you stand on city support of local businesses (as we saw with Wm L Morris); and if you have a personal problem with a business could you rise above it and be objective?

Adrian Grimaldo: Small business is all around us. I was raised in a small business atmosphere my entire life. Grimaldo Enterprises has been in the same location and in operation for close to 30 years. Some 90% of California's businesses are run by local entrepreneurs and every year they are forced to pay higher taxes, interest rates, and larger utility bills. We need to curb these fee's to allow business to reinvest and prosper. I see these issues as inspiration for a solution. I am an optimist this is where my passion for education comes into play. Assisting local business could result in money for our schools and investments in key elements of our infrastructure like technology. I am a Business and Environmental Science major with an emphasis on small business with a minor in water science.
The year is 2010. It's time to tech up and embrace our agrarian backbone. By empowering innovation we can create jobs, utilize resources and give our economy a much needed boost. I want to see contract negotiations for a turbine facility to be built immediately in our Industrial Park. A similar facility was supposed to be built in Santa Paula, but their loss could be our gain. This would create hundreds of jobs. Entry-level assembly positions could be provided starting at $13.00-$15.00 an hour. For this to be possible we would need to draft a proposal immediately. This money would come from U.S. Department of Energy to support Wind Energy Development; currently being offered as of 9/13/2010.

David Lugo: First I want to apologize to the voters of Fillmore for not answering last week’s question. Had I answered it I would have said…My vision for Fillmore is to improve the services the city provides without raising taxes, reduce the cost in the budget and assure that the city builds back its’ reserves. In the last two years this Council over spent and reduced the reserve account from 40% of the general fund to only 21%. I remember Councilman Scott Lee lead the effort to have a healthy reserve and pledge to follow his lead. Another one of my priorities is to have a slow well planned growth that pays for its’ self. It is a privilege to build in Fillmore not a right.
Now today’s question.
I feel the city should help its local businesses as much as possible. We need to keep our businesses in town and also figure out ways to make it easier for new businesses to become locals. There are too many empty store fronts in town as it is and by helping our locals we can possibly keep that number from rising and who knows they can probably expand their businesses by opening a second location or renting an open vacancy next to them. I have not had a problem with a business in town but if I did that would be personal and like I always say don’t take your personal problems to work with you so I could be objective. “Your Voice”.

Patti Walker: I will continue to support and help local businesses at every level.
For instance, through the Storefront Rehabilitation Improvement Program a business owner can apply for financial assistance to offset lease payments, make improvements to the exterior or interior of their building or to comply with handicap access or seismic safety requirements.
Financial assistance has been provided to various local businesses and individuals throughout the years and all decisions to do so were based on varying factors with each having their own terms and conditions of repayment.
Policies are in place which provide the Council with the guidelines that govern to whom and to what degree financial support can be given.
In one instance, I did not support providing financial assistance to a local business. In that matter, I and one other council member voiced concern about providing assistance to a business desiring to move from Central Avenue to the Railroad Promenade. We expressed a concern the move would cause a reduction in foot traffic down Central Avenue. My concern was not based on any personal problem with the business but the affect the move would have on the downtown as a whole. The move did occur and that business has since closed.
I strive to base my decisions not only on the application but also on the location of the business and the surrounding businesses, whether the business has a competing business nearby, if it will provide a service to the community, and the financial impact to the City.

Brian Sipes: Being a small local business owner, I know firsthand how important it is to support our local businesses throughout Fillmore. When I attended the City Council's Goal Setting Workshop back in March, I made a presentation to the City Council listing ways that the City Council can support our local businesses. I firmly believe if we intend to be a "business friendly community", then we must focus on eliminating blight. When I served as a Board of Director for the Fillmore Chamber of Commerce, I repeatedly heard from potential entrepreneurs that blight was a colossal deterrence in bringing their business to Fillmore. This is an issue that I will tackle if elected.
I was pleased to see the majority on the City Council approve an ordinance that gave a 5% credit to local businesses bidding on City projects. If elected, I will also work to implement reduced business license fees to encourage business growth and assist businesses that are struggling through difficult times.
A responsible City Council member must be objective and rise above personal issues with a specific business. My line of business has given me opportunities to deal with situations and rise above conflict. Just as any legitimate business person recognizes their duty to their customers regardless of personal issues. My professional experience will assist me in fulfilling my duties as a City Council member.

November 2nd you will be able to vote for THREE candidates

Question #3: Where do you stand on adding, or not adding, Charter schools into the District? Explain your supporting reasons? Some of the community interpreted the transfer of teachers from Piru to other schools as reprisal for supporting the Charter. What is your interpretation and opinion of the transfers?

Tony Prado: For the purpose of clarification, being the only candidate who is a current Board Member, I am not speaking for the Board or the School District. Also, my duties and responsibilitiles as a Board Member require me to speak carefully regarding school employees and their rights.
My opinion, on the first part of this question is very simple, if the desire for a charter school is parent-driven and a majority of the parents want a charter school, then I would support it. The fact is, the Piru Charter School issue was not parent-driven nor were the majority of parents in favor or it. Also, the Spanish speaking parents were ignored, the Piru English speaking community was ignored and the District was ignored. There was little or no concern as to how it would effect the teachers in the District or the students in the District. The Charter was an ill-conceived idea by a small selfish group of individuals.
There was an Emergency declared at Piru Elementary School. The teachers at Piru School were divided. Feelings and emotions by the teachers were very strong. There appeared to be a lack of courtesy and respect by those for and against the Charter. Effective teaching and learning were in danger in the classroom. Action was necessary and with the recommendation from the District staff an emergency was declared. The Board voted in favor of this emergency.
Today the environment at Piru Elementary School is calm and peaceful. Effective teaching and learning is taking place.

Dave Wilde: Last year I had the opportunity to be on the Piru campus at least once a week working with one of our second year teachers. I can tell you for certain that there was a lot of tension between the two groups of staff members. Even after the California State Board of Education turned down the charter group the tense atmosphere continued. I had a number of concerns. Two are very important. The first is whether a positive learning environment could be created and maintained for the students of Piru under those conditions. The second is whether affective collaboration between instructors in an effort to improve instruction could exist. With those huge concerns in mind I don't think the district had any choice but to move some people around. Those individuals involved still have jobs including benefits. I think we would all agree that the well being of the Piru students comes first.
I have no real feelings about charter schools in particular. I do, however feel that providing parents with a choice is important. A couple of years ago a committee was formed of parents and district staff to discuss ways to improve our schools and the idea of magnet schools and academies was talked about. With budget problems some of those ideas have been put on the back burning, but I would love to see them re-explored. Schools to address gate students and those with special interests in math, science, arts, and language skills would be great for our community of students.

Kim Rivers: I feel FUSD has a great opportunity at collaboration with instructors who are striving to foster academic excellence. It is the duty of a Board that when any discussion, proposal or formal petitions for a charter are brought before them, they consider whether it will enhance the educational options already offered within FUSD. Both California State law and policies of VCOE encourage charters as a way to improve academics, and expand educational options.
To transfer teachers involuntarily FUSD had to declare an emergency and invalidate a section of the certificated contract. How did this action benefit students? To invalidate a labor contract is a serious action, which I know has many district personnel concerned. I feel that this action was taken to prevent any further efforts by these teachers to create a charter school within the District, a right that California Law grants to a majority of certificated members at any school. As a Board member it will be important to me that the District has the highest regard for the legal rights of staff at all levels and that the actions by the District, and ultimately the School Board never leave the District vulnerable to legal action.
I am also concerned about the environment created by Board decisions. It may be hard for employees of FUSD to question a policy, proposal or action, or to suggest something new, if there is a culture that uses reassignment, termination or any other form of intimidation to prevent collaboration. www.votekimrivers.com

Lucy Rangel: Because of the manner in which the Piru Charter proposal was handled by the Petitioners and the District this past year, I would not be in favor of a Charter school in our district at this time. This controversial issue caused division in our district among parents, staff, administration, and our communities of Piru and Fillmore. I would, however, be in favor of a Charter school or even a Magnet school in the future. It takes a great deal of time planning and organizing any type of public educational institution if it is to be successful. Collaboration with the District is a must; and of course, the parents, staff, and community must be supportive of this concept. Everything planned must be in the best interest of all our students.
As far as the transfer of teachers from Piru to the other schools, I can certainly understand why some of the community interpreted these transfers as reprisal for supporting the charter. Since I was not in attendance at all the meetings regarding the Charter proposal, I do not know all of the details. My opinion, however, is that the District was aware of the potential effect that the State’s decision would have not only on Piru School, but also on the entire community. From previous meetings, they also had known that the school climate had already been affected. They should have taken immediate steps to facilitate recovery for all parties. Then, perhaps, the transfer of teachers would not have been necessary.

Mark Austin: California state law has promoted the creation of charter schools (which are public schools) primarily to increase learning opportunities for low-achieving students. This has been done by encouraging and allowing for the creation of charter schools to use innovative teaching methods. In others words, to think outside the box. The state intended to create competition within the public school system by allowing charter schools to innovate and thus provide an educational alternative. Adding charter schools within the boundaries of the Fillmore Unified School District (FUSD) would allow for the provision of unique educational programs. This alone would result in competition between charter schools and the FUSD schools for students. The addition of charter schools would cause the FUSD to scrutinize itself internally and externally, and would force the FUSD to improve the overall quality of education or continue to lose students and funding to charter schools. But the real issue is not whether charter schools should be added in the FUSD. The issue is that existing schools within the FUSD are not meeting the grade.
The involuntary transfer of four teachers to other schools seems to be related to their support of the Piru Elementary School Charter. One merely needs to review the Resolution adopted by the FUSD (June 3, 2010) - that links the involuntary transfers to the Charter attempt. The Charter is mentioned numerous times within the Resolution and is used as the primary reason to declare an emergency circumstance, thus allowing for the transfers. www.votemarkaustin.com

Coral Vega

The Fillmore Gang Unit served three search warrants Saturday morning and arrested three subjects in connection with a gang related brandishing that occurred last week.

On 8-27-2010, patrol deputies responded to a disturbance in the 600 block of Lemon Way, Fillmore. Deputies found that just prior to arriving, a group of six gang members had confronted two rival gang members outside a residence. Witnesses reported that two of the six gang members displayed a handgun.

The Fillmore Gang Unit took over the investigation and identified a male juvenile and 24 year old Jose Barocio 24, as the two suspects. Investigators believe both Barocio and the juvenile brandished a handgun. Their investigation found that just after the confrontation, the juvenile ran to a residence in the 600 block of Via Rodeo. While in the residence, suspect Coral Vega 36, knowingly hid the gang member to avoid arrest.

On 9-4-2010, the Fillmore Gang Unit served three search warrants in an attempt to recover the handgun used in the gang disturbance. During the service of the search warrants, the suspects were at their homes and were arrested. The 17 year old male was lodged into Juvenile Hall and remains in custody without bail. Suspect Coral Vega, was booked into the Ventura County Jail for aiding a felon after the crime and Street Terrorism. She remains in custody on $100,000 bail. Jose Barocio was booked into the Ventura County Jail and remains in custody on $110,000 bail.

The handgun was not located during the searches. Any tips from the community will assist police with recovering the dangerous weapon. Gang Investigators expect to make more arrests.

Question #2: What is your vision for Fillmore if elected? What do you perceive as the 5 most important
priorities for the city?

Patti Walker: I believe in a Fillmore where we live, work, and play; a Fillmore that flourishes and thrives. A vision centering on our quality of life:
environment, housing, transportation, and preservation of all we hold dear.
We have public lands and a scenic river corridor we have not tapped into.
Many priorities Fillmore faces are placed by regulatory agencies - Regional Water Quality Control Board and state and federal legislation.
. RWQCB recently issued a county-wide stormwater permit. The first of many phases requires us to test the stormwater estimated to cost $150,000 a year.
. As co-chair on the Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County we need to comply with SB375 and AB32 to reduce greenhouse gases.
. In spite of my votes against building in the floodplain, building happened. FEMA now certifies levees every five years. Not all Fillmore's levees were in compliance and many residents may need to purchase flood insurance. I was part of the discussions with FEMA and successfully obtained a two-year extension to provide additional data to support our position the levees should be certified. Data is presently being compiled with the help of the County.
. Fillmore continues in its crusade to keep our sales tax revenue earned from businesses with offices in Fillmore. Without these taxes we will be hard-pressed in achieving a strong economy.
We need to focus attention on a plan to promote a strong economic development policy that provides a balanced, sustainable economy so Fillmore prospers well into the future.

Brian Sipes: My vision for Fillmore focuses on our quality of life and fiscal prudence. I strongly believe in a sustainable community that promotes small business growth, communication, customer service, anti-blight initiatives, and improving our work force. My vision also endorses the City of Fillmore's Vision 2020 plan.
My vision does NOT include high density development with three and four story buildings that have been advocated by a few current and past City Council members. Being a native of Fillmore, I respect and adhere to the concept of keeping Fillmore the last, best, small town, in Southern California.
Having attended the City Council's Goals Setting Workshops that were offered to the public in March of 2010, I provided input to the City Council on what citizens have expressed to me. I feel to be an effective leader, you must be able to reach out to all citizens of our community and include all suggestions, concerns and comments.
My vision for Fillmore is universal. I am confident that my leadership and vision will move our City forward so we can adapt to progress for the betterment of this great town.

Question #2: What solutions do you propose to deal with shrinking educational budgets, shortfalls and salary issues?

November 2nd you will be able to vote for THREE candidates

Dave Wilde: If you are following how districts around the nation, state, and county are solving the growing budget issues it becomes obvious that all are using similar solutions. The most widely used are; reducing the length of the school year, increasing class size, and reduction of staff. There are no magic ideas to solve this problem. Until officials in government place a higher priority on public education this problem will continue. Our country depends on the education of our young people. It is what will allow us to continue to be the strongest in the world. With that in mind you take what ever money is available and what you can get and continue in the effort to provide the best possible education you can. Schools do produce a product and that product is young people who are prepared to lead fulfilling and successful lives. If moving monies around and adjustments in the school budget do not address the problems then cuts in staff may be necessary. It is then we must keep instruction at the highest priority.

Salaries were also part of this question. During recent budget short falls I have not heard one comment from a certificated or classified staff member concerning an increase in salary. They are all aware of the problems and working with the district to deal with this budget crisis. Salaries are important. Higher salaries allows the district and school sites to find the best staff they can to contribute to the education of our Fillmore students.

Lucy Rangel: Some of my proposed solutions to this week’s question are as follow:
1. Stop creating new management or administrative positions.
2. If a new position is needed, it should be for a grant writer whose major responsibility would be to find monies available for teacher resources and educational programs.
3. Stop funds from being spent on attorneys and consultants. We have functioned without them in the past by showing mutual respect for one another and by acting in good faith.
4. We need to focus on maintaining our ADA (average daily attendance). We do this by working with and having better communication with parents especially with those whose children are being suspended and with parents who are removing their children from our district. Irregular attendance affects the lottery money and Special Education funds we receive. Maintaining our enrollment generates more revenue for our district.
5. Everyone should know that teachers are given about $100 for classroom supplies for the entire year. They can’t do their best without supplies. Let’s start a campaign to help them!
6. Regarding salary issues, it is important to have a trusting and working relationship with certificated, classified, confidential, and management employees. It is important that all groups be a part of the solution and share in any further cuts that may need to happen.
All aspects of society are dealing with the issue of doing more with less money. In these difficult times I know that our community can come together as a “team” for our most valuable asset – our children!

Tony Prado: Regarding school Board Question #2:
In these tough economic times a school board needs to operate at its best. I believe I can contribute in building and supporting an effective school board that will keep it efforts focused on student learning. As a Board member I believe it is important to develop strategic goal planning. Working with other Board members, the Superintendent, and his staff, the board needs to identify budget priorities. Then the Board needs to develop appropriate processes for budget development and be able to adopt and if necessary, as it usually is in these tough economic times, revise the budget.

Every Board member has the responsibility to listen and gather input from teachers, classified employees, and parents regarding the finances of the district. Board members need to look at what other districts are doing and see how it might help our district. School districts across the state and the nation are experiencing educational budget cuts. When the economy recovers it is essential to restore the school days and the salaries that were reduced.

The economy in California is in bad shape. The revenue school districts receive is less every year. This school year will be the same. There is no simple or easy solution. But as a Board member I will focus the available resources in a manner least impacting our students.

As a Board member I will help establish board policy, not administer. I will be one of 5 Board members working to build a team and providing leadership.

Kim Rivers: With the cuts our District has experienced serious changes need to be made in FUSD. The Board needs to examine all costs and examine what benefit our students actually receive from those expenses. First, I would examine all consulting fees, and eliminate all ineffective expenses in that area. How much is being spent on paying consultants when that work should be done by our current administration? Then we would need to analyze and evaluate all administrative pay packages (ALL of them). Administrator compensation plans have gone up every year without any evaluation of their affect on the level of school performance. How can we give raises to administrators when our schools are failing the state minimum standards year after year? This needs to change. Salary increases for administration must be tied to improvement in our schools. If barely 30% of our students in all categories are proficient (meeting the minimum standards) the Superintendent’s contract renewal clauses should reflect this dismal performance.

Most (or as) importantly, the District must stop cutting the salaries, supply budgets and hours of our dedicated teachers and hard working classified employees. Every aspect of our economy, culture and society depends on our children receiving the best education WE can provide. Education is the key to OUR future. Therefore, our Community should not accept anything less than excellence. www.votekimrivers.com

Mark Austin: California is struggling with budget issues that have resulted in less money being provided to the Fillmore Unified School District (FUSD). So the existing FUSD school board decided what reductions to make as part of the 2010-2011 Annual Budget. Well the school board decided that the best way to balance the budget was to reduce a teacher’s ability to provide a quality education. In addition, the school board reduced important student time in the classroom. Expenses were reduced by – reducing the work year for teachers (5-day reduction in student instruction) – increasing classroom size - and reducing health care benefits for employees.
While this may not be a popular answer to some people, the school board should deal with future shrinking budgets and shortfalls by carefully examining the number of upper management and administration staff positions in the FUSD. The school board should examine the existing salaries and capabilities of each upper management and administrative position. These positions currently account for approximately $1.9 million in general fund expenditures. Since budget reductions have already been done at the teacher and student levels, common sense would dictate, that the next round of budget reductions would come at these levels. To reduce the budget, there would need to be either salary reductions and/or the elimination of some positions. In addition, the salary levels for all upper management and administrative staff should be frozen with no cost of living adjustments (COLA) until the economy has recovered.

Please visit my website at http://www.votemarkaustin.com

Left, Deputy Leo Vazquez with Captain Tim Hagel (right) review the benefits of the SRO during Tuesday night’s meeting.
Enlarge Photo

On Tuesday, September 7, 2010 the Fillmore School Board of Trustees met for a regularly scheduled meeting at their Boardroom in Fillmore. All Board members were in attendance and it was a full agenda.

Board President Tony Prado began the meeting by introducing and welcoming the new student representative Sean Chandler, a senior at Fillmore High School who holds the position of Speaker of the House for the student body. Chandler gave a summary of the make up of the student body government and of the recent events kicking off the school year, including the recent Flashes football victory over Malibu with an impressive score of 53 to zero.

Public comment was short and uneventful as no one from the public chose to address the Board on any topic. Moving on Prado announced the ten-day notice being given of a Public Hearing for the “Sufficiency of Textbooks and Instructional Materials for the 2010-2011 School Year and the Provision of Standards Aligned Instructional Materials”. The public hearing will take place at the next regular Board meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 21, 2010. The hearing will also cover the “Instructional Materials for the Structured English Immersion Program” for this year. This hearing allows the public to comment on the whether there are enough supplies and textbooks for each student, and whether they are aligned with the State standards.

As the Board reviewed written communication received, the first item discussed was a letter from the Ventura County Office of Education. Prado described the letter as saying, “We are OK.” Assistant Superintendent Mike Bush clarified that with the letter “they do caution that we are deficit spending”. Bush indicates that this was the plan of FUSD, but the VCOE is warning against “prolonged deficit spending”. Next item was a letter sent to all California School Districts from Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Prado summarized the letter as pertaining to issues involving “meetings and being transparent in all aspects of our meetings”. In fact the letter, available online in a press release from the Governors Office states “there is still no transparent fiscal information easily available to parents who want to see how their school districts and schools are spending their tax dollars. We should be especially transparent in showing where districts spend their money: how much is spent on district administration and at each school site, and how much makes its way into the classroom. Parents deserve to know if the school district their child is attending shares their funding priorities.” the letter goes on “and this level of transparency will hopefully reinforce their confidence that their local school board is making the wisest decisions possible for their children’s education.”

During Board reports, CONTINUED »

Over the next nine (9) weeks the Gazette will be printing one question a week, which has been given to each of five Fillmore City Council candidates. They have been asked to provide one answer, 250 words or less.

Question #1: How will your inclusion make this a better city council? What personal, business or government experiences qualify you to be a good council candidate?

Patti Walker: With over 30 years experience as a legal assistant and para legal, I have a strong background in research that enables me to quickly review and understand a large amount of information. Of those 30 plus years, I was self-employed for 27, giving me a firm grasp of business needs and functions.

I have been a council member for eight years and am aware and informed on the various issues that Fillmore is facing - budget constraints, economic development challenges, storm water permitting, and FEMA levee certification, for instance. I have prided myself on striving to look for solutions and not dwell on the problem. I work hard to base my decisions on staff reports, research, and testimony at the meetings. I weigh the information keeping in mind what is best for Fillmore as a whole.

I have been a long-time volunteer in the community - First United Methodist Church, Soroptimist International, Fillmore, Friends of the Fillmore Library, Heritage Valley Tourism Bureau, AYSO, and Fillmore Planning Commission.

I am the current Council representative to Ventura Regional Sanitation District, Ventura County Transportation Commission, Vista 126, SB 375 Sustainable Ventura County Compact, Economic Development Collaborative - Ventura County, Film Commission, and Piru Fillmore Veterans Memorial Board. On many of these commissions I hold various seats on sub-committees that directly affect the citizens of Fillmore.

Brian Sipes: I will make the Fillmore City Council better by being able to conduct City business on day one of my term. I have attended more City Council meetings than any other candidate, other than Mayor Patti Walker. I have been consistently more engaged in the problems facing Fillmore and have a better understanding of the issues.

I am qualified to be a good City Council candidate for various reasons. I am a Fillmore native and a co-owner of a small local business. I feel it's important that the Fillmore City Council have representation from a business oriented individual that has the ability to provide solutions for both citizens and the business community.

Being a professional in the field of finance, I have the analytical skills that are needed, so responsible decisions can be made. For years, much of my time has been devoted to City Council meetings as well as subcommittee meetings. I've educated myself so that I am up to speed on all City issues. I am also a long time proactive community volunteer, a graduate of the "Ventura County Citizens Planning Academy", a past Board of Director for the Fillmore Chamber of Commerce (2003-2005), and a local small business owner. I have the skills, commitment and energy to be an effective City Council member.

David Lugo: My name is David Lugo and as a city council member I feel that I can get fellow city council members to think of new ways to reduce cost in the city of Fillmore rather than raising fees and taxing our residents. Other solutions are out there; it may take a fresh set of eyes to find them, I feel I’m that set of eyes. I have been with the Parks and Recreation committee for over 3 years as a commissioner and the Little League President for 4 years. With that I feel I can be a great city council member for the resident of Fillmore.

Over the next nine (9) weeks the Gazette will be printing one question a week, which has been given to each Fillmore School Board candidate. They have been asked to provide one answer, 250 words or less.

Question #1: How will you make this a better school board? What personal, business or government experiences qualify you to be on the school board?

Mark Austin: I would make the board better by providing a fresh perspective to the District. For example, my belief is that the District should be concentrating more on the vision and goals of the District. That is to focus on making the school system better. I believe this is missing with the existing board and the status quo is the mode of operation.

My local government experience has provided me with decision making skills needed to be a board member. While serving on the Fillmore Planning Commission for the past eleven years, I have been placed in the position of making difficult decisions that affect the community. I have made decisions that required independent judgment and the ability to listen carefully to the public, to ask clear questions, and to decide issues fairly. These decisions have required that I consider the pros and cons of each decision and do what I believe to be in the best interest of the community. This experience will enable me to act in the best interest of the parents and children.

My business experience has provided me with leadership skills needed to be a board member. I handle the daily operations of my firm. This includes assisting the company management team to ensure that goals are met and with long-term strategic planning. This is the role of a board member in a nutshell — to attend to the daily details while carrying out the vision of the District: that of providing a quality education.

Tony Prado: I have a commitment to public education, and I want to contribute to this community. I bring experience in public education and an awareness of the long-range issues of education in our country, state, and in Fillmore. Being a board member is not dealing with a single issue but looking at the whole picture, understanding what students, teachers, classified, and administrators need to make the district successful. Most of all, I consider myself to be a good team player and team leader.

My history and experience in Fillmore makes me the most qualified candidate for the School Board. I have a B.A. in History from California State University, Northridge, an M.S. in Education from the University of Southern California and I am a retired teacher/coach from Moorpark High School. In the 1980's and 1990's, I was chairman of the San Cayetano, Sespe, and Fillmore High School site councils and chairman of the District Advisory Committee. Also, I served 4 years on the Parks and Recreation commission ( 2 years as chairman ) and served as President of Fillmore Little League for 3 years. From 1995-2003, I had the privilege to be elected to the Fillmore Unified School District Board of Trustsee's. I was again fortunate to be elected to the Board in 2006.

All children in the Fillmore/Piru community have an opportunity to receive a good education. My goal is to continue this opportunity, to adjust, adapt and be flexible, to be accessible, open and compassionate to all people.

Lucy Rangel: I will make this a better school board by stressing the importance of “teamwork.” If we are to achieve our goals, and face more budget cuts, we must unite together in a professional, respectful manner. If we are to move forward in a positive way, we must have input from all groups concerned in the education of our children. Our district has great students, a hard-working dedicated staff, and parents who want the best for their children. We need our leaders to step up and direct everyone in a positive, motivating manner, and understand that we are all here for one thing—to give our youth the best education possible.

I feel I am qualified to be on the school board because I have personally seen our district through the eyes of a student, parent, teacher, and a school leader. As a student, I attended and am a proud graduate of Fillmore High. As a parent, my late husband, Jim, and I raised five children, Kristen, Eric, Jason, Amy and Maria. All of them received an excellent education here in Fillmore. Now I have two grandchildren in our school system. As a teacher of 37 years, I am familiar with our programs and curriculum both at the elementary and secondary levels. Finally, as a leader in our schools, I have coached, been an ASB advisor, a GATE and Mentor teacher, a Sixth Grade chairperson, a member of numerous committees, and I also had some experience as an assistant principal.

Kimberly Rivers: I was inspired to run after watching several months of the School Board showing a general lack of respect to parents, teachers and those community members who came before the Board with questions, information and concerns. I was shocked to hear the Board defend the current state of the schools as “excellent”. It is clear to me that our School Board needs to take the leadership role that the law mandates in guiding the District in a new direction.

When elected I will compel the Board to work with parents, community members, teachers, staff, County and State experts to find solutions that work. In making decisions I will ask, and demand that my fellow Board members ask, “Is this in the best interests of all our students?” We must keep our resources in the classroom.

I feel that both my professional and personal history provide me with the tools, as well as the inquisitive, independent and open mind needed to work in and turn around the culture of our District. As a parent, non-profit Board president and someone who professionally supports families I feel comfortable and confident in listening and getting to the heart of the issue in order to find an idea that works. I know the importance of being in touch with what is happening in education statewide in order to bring cutting edge programs and opportunity to ALL of our students. Parents should feel confident that their children have every possible opportunity at academic success. www.votekimrivers.com.

Dave Wilde: Schools are all about providing the best instruction for our students. We must make every effort to do what you can to support that goal. To support that goal we must insure that we do all we can to provide teachers with the materials and knowledge to help them become successful educating their students. Support staff must be in place to assist both students and teachers at all times. Facilities, both indoors and outdoors, must be in top shape to provide the right learning environment for our students. That includes the school site, classrooms and co-curricular locations.

I have 37 years of classroom experience, mostly in the area of high school science. In addition to being a classroom instructor I have served in many other roles. I have been in charge of several extracurricular programs. I have been the student government adviser, head softball coach, head football coach, head golf coach, and athletic director. I was one of two PAR teachers for four years. That program was in place to assist first year teachers to Fillmore and to provide data which a panel used to retain or let teachers go. That program was in place to insure we did what we could to provide the best instructors for our children. I have also been part of the Ventura County Office of Education's BTSA program which assists new teacher in completing steps to secure their California Clear Teaching Credential. I am currently in my seventh year in that position.

School Resource Officer Leo Vazquez

Due to a cost sharing agreement Fillmore Unified School District will continue to have a School Resource Office (SRO) on campus during the school day. Officer Leo Vasquez will serve as the SRO. His salary and costs associated with having an SRO on campus will be split up between the District, the City of Fillmore and the Ventura County Sheriff’s Department. FUSD and the City each will be contributing $75,000 toward the annual costs and salary for the SRO. Captain Tim Hagel confirmed that the Sheriff’s office would be contributing $39,100 plus over $6,000 annually towards the cost of maintaining the police car. Hagel pointed out that the total cost associated with the SRO includes costs over and above the officer’s salary “such as liability insurance, workman comp etc. His salary is far-less than that and no where in the ballpark of the total costs.”

When asked about where Vasquez will be based, District Superintendent Jeff Sweeney responded that he expects him to use the office on the high school campus as previous SRO’s have, but that he will go to any campus when needed. Sweeney went on to comment “The SRO responds to the needs of FUSD. That is his assignment. I know he is planning on being a presence at every campus, visiting every campus every week.”

When asked about the petition presented to the School Board in May 2010 which was signed by 181 parents supporting the position that the money spent on the SRO would be better spent on educational needs Sweeney responded “There were several conversations about the SRO and his value to the District over the past two years. The Board decided that it was in the District's best interest to maintain the safety of our students and staff, therefore the continued funding of the position.”

Hagel provided information stating that there were 269 arrests on school campuses in FUSD in 2009. Hagel commented that this is the “highest arrest rate county wide” for SRO positions. And Hagel went on to state “These statistics represent that the SRO makes more arrests per year on campus than any other police officer makes in neighborhoods in town.” In the City of Fillmore “gang membership hovers at about 150” with many school age members, and some still attending Fillmore Middle School, Fillmore High School and Sierra High School, reported Hagel. The SRO’s specifice duties range from tracking all gang members who attend school and conducting home visits of truant students and bring them back to school to supervising dances, and other school events along with administering breath tests for marijuana use and other controlled substances. In addition Hagel believes the SRO is a clear deterrent to fighting.

Officer Vasquez is surely comfortable working with and around young people as he also serves as the youth advisor for the Boys and Girls Youth Explorers and is sure to be a vital part of maintaining the safest possible environment at Fillmore area schools.