Supremes told Arizona law repels 'invasion'
By Anonymous — Tuesday, February 14th, 2012
Identifying illegals 'consistent' with goals of both state, federal constitutions
Written By Bob Unruh, WorldNetDaily A brief filed today with the U.S. Supreme Court argues that Arizona’s contested state law allowing law-enforcement officers to ask about the legal status of people they encounter is justified because of the virtual “invasion” of the state by outsiders. “As provided in the Constitution, the power to repel against invasions was … granted to both the federal and the state governments,” stated the brief filed by Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch. “This action is consistent with the notion that the federal and state governments are both sovereign bodies within the United States,” the brief explained. “Furthermore, the state of Arizona, with its general police power, a power the Founding Fathers intentionally did not give to the federal government, surely has the power to protect the health, safety and welfare of those residing within its borders.” At issue before http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/supremes-told-arizona-law-repels-invasion/ |